Two conventional monitors or one Ultrawide – which is better

Configurations of two or more monitors can be found at the stock exchange, the security post of some serious organization, or in the flight control center. More mundane and close to us options are a fast food cafe, a design studio, a recording studio, the workplace of a hacker programmer or streamer.

In some use-cases, ultra-wide monitors may become an alternative to dual-display systems . Let’s try to compare them and describe the pros and cons of each of the options.

Multi-monitor configurations
First of all, two-monitor systems are created to expand the working space and increase labor productivity. Two displays can significantly increase the amount of information displayed or open several programs at the same time. Often, one of the monitors is used as the main one, and on the auxiliary one they have reference data or conduct parallel activities, for example, in instant messengers, social networks, mail. The second monitor is often used by creators (content creators) and programmers to control and preview the final result of work in real time.

Configurations of two or three monitors have also fallen in love with a number of gamers. As it turned out, the increased peripheral visibility can significantly increase the immersion in the gameplay.

The idea of ​​using multiple displays is supported not only by users, but also by monitor manufacturers. For example, the well-known American company Dell has been producing the Dell MDS19 Dual Monitor desktop bracket for many years, designed for mounting two monitors.

NSE6_FWF-6.4 Dumps

AD0-E314 PDF Dumps

350-801 PDF Dumps

ACA-Developer PDF Dumps.

C_SAC_2102 Exam Dumps

PDI Exam Dumps.

Sales-Cloud-Consultant Practice Exam.

SnowPro-Core Practice Test

MS-740 Practice Test Questions

HPE6-A66 Practice Test

HPE6-A72 Test Questions

HPE6-A73 Practice Questions

CISA Questions

312-50v11 PDF Questions

810-01 Exam Questions

The stand has a distinctive corporate design, fits seamlessly into the interior and is capable of accommodating two monitors up to 27 inches. A fly in the ointment is the price of about $ 200, which, for a second, is equal to the cost of one decent 27-inch monitor from Dell itself (of course, not UltraSharp, but still).

27 “Monitor Dell S2721HS Gray
Also on sale you can find many more democratic brackets for two, three and even four monitors, which allow you to position and even rotate the displays in any way you want .

Philips took a slightly different path, creating the Two-in-One Monitor in 2014, the first of its kind to combine two 19-inch IPS displays with an aspect ratio of 5: 4. The ultra-thin bezels created the illusion of a single 32-inch screen. They asked for a considerable $ 500 at that time.

However, many users of multi-monitor configurations do without any problems and simply place several monitors in a row .

Ultrawide Monitors
Dual-monitor configurations indirectly prepared us for the ultra-wide displays that burst into our lives about ten years ago. And the appearance of films and games with a ratio of 21: 9 only strengthened their success – the Ultrawide range is growing every year.

The first ultra-wide models were available in 25-29 inches and 2560 x 1080 pixels. Today, you can find huge 49-inch displays with a resolution of up to 5120 x 1440. The most popular are 34-inch (3440 x 1440) monitors, which have received, perhaps, the optimal combination of size and price.

34 “Monitor Samsung Odyssey G5 C34G55TW black 41 999 *
Most often Ultrawide have an aspect ratio of 21: 9, which in comparison with the classic 16: 9 allows you to significantly increase the “horizontal area” of the screen. However, a full replacement for two monitors are the so-called ultra-wide displays with a ratio of 32: 9 (32:10). For example, a 43 “32:10 model matches two 24” 16:10 displays.

43.4 “Monitor ASUS ROG Strix XG43VQ black 82 999 *
Which is better?
Multi-monitor configurations involve the installation of a set of several monitors at the workplace, the number, orientation and location of which can be easily changed if necessary. You can also combine devices of different sizes and resolutions. Everything will depend on the tasks facing the user.


If two displays are enough for work, it makes sense to think about an ultra-wide model. This option will be more suitable for home use, which focuses on surfing the Internet, movies and games. Let’s discuss what bonuses and pitfalls await us in each case.

Frame joint

This is one of the biggest problems with multi-monitor solutions, especially when it comes to games and movies. Manufacturers have been able to reduce the thickness of the side frames to literally a few millimeters, nevertheless they remain and are visually very noticeable. However, when it comes to working with tables and documents, it is difficult to call it a big drawback. In shooters, the joint in the middle can put a cross on a two-monitor system, no matter how punny it sounds.


Ultrawide monitors have a single workspace. Moviegoers can enjoy watching the movie to the maximum, and gamers can fully immerse themselves in the gameplay. At the same time, professionals have complete freedom of action and can expand to full screen one single program or display several applications at the same time, arranging them at their own discretion.

Cables and connections

There shouldn’t be any special problems with the simultaneous connection of two monitors today, but when creating a system of three or more displays , some difficulties may arise. Second, the user is provided with a huge “braid” of cables behind the desk.


One monitor, one video cable. This is the second reason for the success of ultra-wide solutions. Buying and connecting one device is much easier to fit into the head of an ordinary user who does not want to bother with unnecessary settings. I connected it, turned it on, if necessary, calibrated it . Windows 10 will recognize and run everything by itself.

Graphics requirements

Both multi-monitor configurations and ultra-wide displays require a powerful graphics card when it comes to modern gaming and graphics. The adapter of the middle price segment can ensure the operation of an Ultrawide monitor with a resolution of no higher than 2560 x 1080 pixels. For 3440 x 1440, 5120 x 2160, you will need top-end graphics accelerators. The latter, by the way, also applies to a system of two or more monitors.


The dual-monitor configuration allows you to select devices with any required specifications. However, graphics professionals say that due to the individual characteristics of the matrices, even on new monitors from the same batch, one hundred percent match cannot be achieved . Secondly, colors drift over the years, and each monitor has a different way, and it becomes more and more difficult to bring them to a common denominator.


An ultra-wide monitor cannot have such a problem in principle. But another comes up – shortcomings in the form of highlights, inhomogeneity of the backlight and tint , which are more pronounced in a wide workspace than in the case of the classic 16: 9.

Financial question

From a financial point of view, buying two 16: 9 monitors is often more profitable than purchasing one 32: 9 device . Moreover, those who want to save money can simply buy a second monitor. At the same time Ultrawide with 21: 9 aspect ratio has managed to drop in price over the past couple of years and can compete with good 16: 9 models.

Concentration of attention

Sometimes one of the disadvantages of ultra-wide monitors is called the inability to concentrate, since the horizontally enlarged working surface greatly diffuses attention. Secondly, it can be difficult to cover a huge screen area, even if it is curved to a certain extent. Of course, this does not apply to games and watching movies.


Configurations of two or more monitors, having many options for spatial arrangement, are more flexible in this regard. This allows you to better distribute attention between different tasks and focus on the program with which you are currently working. After all, an unnecessary monitor can always be turned off.

Instead of output
According to the author, most users looking to expand their workspace find it easier to buy one ultra-wide monitor. The task is facilitated by the rapidly growing range of Ultrawide – today every well-known manufacturer has such monitors. And recently the main problem of gamers was solved – finally, there appeared high-speed matrices for ultra-wide monitors with a refresh rate above 200 Hz.

Configurations of two or more monitors often remain the lot of professionals who understand why they are needed and how to properly dispose of them.